|
Audit Evidence Versus Forensic Evidence (1440Q) |
Course CPE: 2 hours Field(s) of Study: Auditing–1 hr; Business Management and Organization–1 hr Program Level: Intermediate Prerequisites: Previous training or research on subject matter being taught. Such persons are often at a mid-level within the organization, with operational and/or supervisory responsibilities. Advanced Preparation: None Delivery Method: QAS Self-Study
|
Item
Number: 20FL0619AEVF2
Shipping Weight: 0lbs. 0oz. |
Price:
$147.00 |
|
|
Recording Date: June 19, 2020
Presenter: Francisco "Frank" Rosillo
Program Description:
In this course, the presenter will discuss the following: 1) Comparisons of the Traditional Audit Model based on Management Assertions to the Forensic “Testimonial Model"; 2) Forensic Credentials—Fraud Related versus Litigation Support Related; 3) Similarities between an Audit Engagement versus a Forensic Engagement; and 4) Practice Tips for a successful forensic engagement and the management of forensic evidence.
After completing this course, attendees will be able to:
- Identify the tools and knowledge necessary to understand the nature, differences, and similarities of forensic evidence used during the litigation process and audit evidence normally gathered during a traditional audit engagement
- Differentiate court room etiquette and rules of evidence applicable to the testifying expert in support of an opinion proffered
For more information regarding refund or concerns, please contact our offices at (800) 677-2009.
The Consultants’ Training Institute (CTI) is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be submitted to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors through its website: www.nasbaregistry.org.
|
|
|