|
Experts Sabotaging Themselves in Court-The Judges Tell All | (170609A_N) |
CPE Credits: 2 Hour Fields of Study: Business Law–2 hrs Program Level: Overview Prerequisites: None required. These overview programs may be appropriate for professionals at all organizational levels. Advanced Preparation: None Delivery Method: Self-Study
|
Item
Number: 17PFFCHI0609A
Shipping Weight: 0lbs. 0oz. |
Price:
$147.00 |
|
|
Recording Date: June 9, 2017
Presenter:Elizabeth Gonzalez; Steven I. Platt; Christopher P. Yates; Michael Kaplan
Program Description:
The official role of the valuation or financial forensic expert is to assist the trier of fact in interpreting and understanding the financial evidence. Many experts, however, are blindsided in the courtroom when they find out that their professional opinions are laden with landmines in the form of unverified evidence, unreasonable assumptions, risky leaps of faith, inappropriate protocol, and inadvertent departures from professional standards. In this webinar, Judges Gonzalez, Platt, and Yates will share the challenges that they have encountered with financial professionals and offer guidelines and approaches to solidify our opinions and persuasiveness in the legal environment.
After completing this course, you will be able to:
- Identify the criteria that judges use in evaluating the credibility of an expert and veracity of the expert's opinions.
- Determine and explain the legal parameters defining the role of the expert.
- Identify toxic influences that erode a financial expert's credibility.
- Identify and formulate check point tests to ensure compliance with professional standards.
- Determine and Outline the risks related to unchallenged assumptions and leaps of faith.
- Select a working protocol to facilitate objective and unbiased analysis and opinions free from the advocacy driving the legal disputes.
For more information regarding refund or concerns, please contact our offices at (800) 677-2009.
The Consultants’ Training Institute (CTI) is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be submitted to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors through its website: www.nasbaregistry.org. |
|
|